Translate

Saturday, November 17, 2018

Mohamed, the prophet of Islam, ‘married’ a 6-year-old. Millions are preaching the sanctity of child marriages and of pedophilia as a result. Please, check the web, to realize that it is not in any case an exaggeration.

Mohamed, THE prophet of Islam, ‘married’ a 6-year-old. Millions are preaching the sanctity of child marriages and of pedophilia as a result. Please, check the web, to realize that it is not in any case an exaggeration.





ISLAM PREACHING «MARRIAGES» OF ADULTS WITH CHILDREN.





This email is a part of a one only-sent campaign. Your email will not be used again nor given.




This petition aimed at letting people know about a simple fact:
MOHAMMED, PROPHET OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION, ‘MARRIED’ HIS FOURTH ‘WIFE’. HE WAS OVER 50 YEARS OLD WHEN THE ‘MARRIAGE’ TOOK PLACE, THE ‘SPOUSE’ WAS A LITTLE GIRL CALLED AISHA, SHE WAS 6 YEARS OLD.


I REMOVED THE LINKS OF THE QUOTES I EDITED HERE. I HAD TO DO THIS IF NOT THERE IS TOO MANY LINKS TO BE SENT. THEY ARE ALL REFERENCED AND LINKED ON MY BLOG.

Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6 and the ‘marriage’ (I am sorry there is unfortunately no other word around to qualify that daily officialized horrific shame and guilt of our societies) was said to be consummated she was 9.  There is some debate within Islam about her age, but the overwhelming consensus is 6.  Below are the hadith (records of the actions of Mohammed that are very much a part of Islam) in support of this:
 
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.  Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236

'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.  Sahih Muslim 8:3310

From the hadith of the Sunan of Abu Dawud, volume 2, #2116 "Aisha said, "The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old." (The narrator Sulaiman said: "Or six years."). "He had intercourse with me when I was 9 years old."
By wikiislam.


“These texts are direct translation of the Hadith, Arabic Ḥadīth (“News” or “Story”), also spelled Hadīt , record of the traditions or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, revered and received as a major source of religious law and moral guidance, second only to the authority of the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam.
By BRITANNICA encyclopedia.
Hadith has become a synonym for the term Sunnah.”

However, the plight is not more about what the scriptures say but about the thousands of documents produced by Muslim preachers, believers or followers entirely condoning, honoring and recommending this marriage of an old man with a young child.
This information is accurate. Please, be aware that ‘these teachings’ legitimised as fundamental to the Islamic religion can be found by the thousands on the internet via a very simple word search.
Preaching that the marriage of Mohammed to a little girl is appropriate or can be taken as a, or the model has grave and beyond horrid and vile consequences.  From child marriage in countries like Saudi Arabia, to the many stories of Imams being caught on camera in Britain agreeing to marry children and presenting it as a suitable practice under Islam. 
The campaign and petition have two purposes: One, to ensure that people know what happens. The ‘marriages’ in themselves but also the fact that marriages of children with adults are in fact professed via the teaching of Islam. Two, it would then ask the government to sanction direct or indirect incentives and incitation to paedophilia and child marriage (paedophile marriages). Pragmatically, it means that Islamic teachers should be condemning child marriage systematically, and be severely sanctioned when advocating it. To praise Mohammed’s life without expressively condemning child marriage is in fact support to paedophilia.
The prophet Mohammed is highly praised and constantly cited as being the prophet and only prophet of Islam. His name is introduction to almost any communication and verbal or written exchange in culture Islam.
No one needs to enter madrasas, Islamic schools, to figure out that Mohammed’s life is given as example and model.


 STOP CHILD MARRIAGE AND CHILD MARRIAGE PREACHING. 


PS: These acts or arrangements have traditionally been called child marriage. Still calling them child marriage hopefully would remind us who needs to be, by any means, protected. To call them paedophilic marriage could focus on the criminalization of paedophiles and paedophilic cultures permitting, encouraging it. To call it ‘child marriage’ stops naming what, once we know, make us all complicit of, since not stopping it. 


PS: Please note that two previous petitions has been refused or removed without any warnings or adequate justifications, also on main petitions specialised sites, petitions have limited time to get signed.

The petition I attempted via the UK government website, did not match the criteria, and had been catalogued under unpetitionable cultural matters. 



This idol, for which no discussion asserting the grandeur of islam and its master is tolerated, and is in fact, quite famously now sanctioned by death penalty. It is not called terrorism, the rules, here sharia and other Islamic laws, that are perpetrated by the power, or one of the powers in a given country.

Can Muslims be executed for converting?
Apostasy, or leaving the faith, is a very controversial issue in the Muslim world and experts say the majority of scholars believe it is punishable by death.
The Koran itself declares there is "no compulsion" in religion.
By the BBC.

Al-Taqiyya, Dissimulation
There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (for the Shia).  These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them. 
By the religion of peace.




Ban the preaching of child marriage by Islamic preachers - and all others.



How China censorship forbids all videos (while next could be Russia), and blogs from western cultures: not an exaggeration Chinese people cannot access any YouTube, google (to name but a few), these sites are just entirely and exhaustively banned and since last year internet users could be imprisoned if they try to access them (by buying software able to jump the firewall). SAME AS FOR THE SUBJECT ABOVE, HORRENDOUS BUT NOWHERE CLEARLY IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, SOMETIMES IN FACT INSISTING AND REPEATING THE OPPOSITE (like the BBC and to my knowledge all others major media institutions very own practice, so much for the 4th power, estate, and 4th branch of the government), THUS MAKING BELIEVE TO THE HUGE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION THAT IN FACT THOSE GROUPS HAVE PEACEFUL INTENTS AND WELL-FOUNDED DOCTRINES, WHILE ANY DEBUTANTS AT IT, IF SERIOUSLY RESEARCHING, WOULD KNOW IT IS ONLY DECEPTIVE.

Cannot hyperlink because was on the radio, but worthy item by the BBC to which I will refer here because while censorship of all informal (all blogs and videos) and artistic western sources is taking place and that the main media does not talk directly about it, many blogs and alternative posts have been made about it (perhaps mainly by people having lived in China- in the past since now blogging for west (only possible with the help of software bypassing the Great Firewall of China) from china will be regarded as a criminal offence. However, the BBC (updated and ground-breaking- it happens) is the only one that I know that talked about how internet choices and activities made by their citizens are stored by the government and how it affects (positively or negatively) their welfare states, perspectives of jobs, of becoming civil servants, or benefiting from states services (in some part of China people cannot afford for their ID and multiple certificate applications), if state thinks that the citizens ticked the ‘wrong’ or the ‘right’ options.




Genocides we don't know, or don't want to know about.

Given that is going on in the USA where everybody surely fell for terror and cannot speak any longer without going against their nations. Or by taking side for her finally flourishing demon or without daunting anything coming from their colleagues and neighbors- an opportunity to clean kkkill. Even if this far right presidency went away, the schism, the hypocrisy, folly, impunity, misdeed and unfaithfulness all combined it created, will never ever in one generation heal. And to whom will profit the deal? To whom will profit from the dictate and fears of speaking it will have been sowing?
Brought out of what unauthentic guy characterized as a system of fake news (noise of populist capitalizing captive- advertising entertainment propelled by the new-born-again like politician figure, who is worse than mafia, for having become civil servants- and let’s hope or pray or say that they won’t be able to do dodge their being investigated. Since if tax fraudsters are at the head, amongst other things, then it amounts to announce that democracy was murdered (and slaughtered again and again most notably by the biggest companies and states when pulling off international treaties attempting to decrease those same agents’ possibility for appropriation and destruction- in terms of capacities bacteria could [wail will] do the same) well before by the clear majority of philosophies, politics and religions [wile and wilt] destroying animals and environment as a concept of progress and enlightenment Un-naively democracy is dead, or rather not it, it is done as: ‘has never lived, but its every shred shared’), which is a veil and a reinforcement process-procedural stinking stunt, to bolster embolies through A-level censorship method and pathway, that regime of ‘no news’.
The people who attack the media this preposterously, are in fact very one cannot be happier (versus contented) with what the media do, they just want them to do it more. They work with mainstream journalism and do not bother with others; because to attempt campaigning otherwise -outside the few hundred people speaking to millions- is just as socially and politically impacting as being unreportedly kidnapped, made disappear into a desert and die. You do not need bullet for a whistle-blower, you just need a sack and a gag. As for firing the arsonists, they hold the keys- though not to the Olympian sky.



Ban the preaching of child marriage by Islamic preachers - and all others.
I REMOVED THE LINKS OF THE QUOTES I EDITED HERE. I HAD TO DO THIS IF NOT THERE ARE TOO MANY LINKS FOR THE MESSAGE TO BE SENT. SOURCES ARE ALL REFERENCED AND LINKED ON THIS WEBPAGE.


-        Item on grooming in the UK while police and social services have been proven complicit or passive.

-        One in four children in the UK under the poverty line: not a secret, a frequent headline, at least in the UK.

-        How while far-right threat has spread all over Europe, the UK is the best destination for female genital mutilation.
-        While Europe starts excelling in human trafficking, and organs harvests. During which time population more and more die of respiratory diseases caused by lethal pollution that have for only equal the degree of desertification of the country side, not the lack of their sirs, but the one of the trees and species that are no more, but farms destroying any corners left of nature and then enjoy animal breeding -culture- for slaughters.  

-        How university fees and research will be paid by the banks, that will decide from the students they will agree to send or not send (to ‘recruit’ or not ‘recruit’, to the surveys they will lead and initiate and the results they will publishate. No formation, just to format.

-        How it just takes maximum a first semester in political sciences for beginners to know that referendum is widely considered as potentially totally undemocratic. You know, would you like to vote to rip lgbt people off their rights to marry, (one of the traditional step to bring people to worse than serfage) novelty.

-        And how ‘child marriages’ even when illegal are tolerated and happening de facto in so many ‘muslim’ and ‘christian’ countries, including the USA, with the highest rates in the world in Africa like Niger, CAR, Chad, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Mali….

-        -        And how in France notably, cons and business alike get away with anything dragging journalists before courts asking for millions of euros when the press did disclosure or searched for information. Charlie Hebdo had to fight several trials by many organizations (mainly islamic, catholic, far right) just for having published caricatures, with the clear aim of entertaining, often out of situations and people so discriminatory in what they do and successful that laugh is used as a last remedy, for long no more as comedy. Pre-assassinations, the press itself in France, treated Charlie Hebdo magazine with a generalized and systematized contempt that is agonizing to watch, and now powerlessly, cowardly witness. On the megalomania of the inquisition, or how cheap will sound now the idea of a philosopher king. As for the rest, the extreme will sympathise with the Russian who reignites the armament armada stupendously, and the others are so filthy and rich they don’t need to be far of any side, they just are gods to the same way they respect insects, inspect, the same way they will do it to the common, a citizenship dishonest. People since then won’t dare to speak or at least to do so with an honorable meaning, they will suffocate at the idea of breathing. The man and woman in the street who will in return roam to make sure everyone is in the line of nothingness that numerously will enumerate, who needs discrimination when the reign is annihilate. In France one in 5 children lives under the poverty line. 


And murders with dignitas, swiss style- another fiscal paradies, the emblem of money cleansing, and when the pro-life are mostly the ones that would, lives trap, threat, throat and rape.
But of course, all of it and more will be taken back by far right and left throwing the responsibility, the culpability of not responding at others groups, while their countries had plundered. And while they are too coward and undignified to address, pretending to candour, their own countries, nations and workers and say we cannot not stop misery- because misery is what they would like to assume and produce on a very larger and systematic scale than the upper middle-class, and every of the rest helping her, that just let it hap-pen.
Awe. You imagine now, with the kind of work that do the police, this will encourage the far right! While police are in most countries where a far right exist very keen to be ‘ultra-nationalist’ members, encourage a polarized, a fascist position on teenage rapes or security that they do not deal with, therefore producing an enlarged and enraged population or populist reaction. If so, could one envisage the next step, a coup that could be staged. To neglect one’s work to force people-for your party to be voted for.







Thursday, November 1, 2018

My o-pinion on brexit:


My o-pinion on brexit:

How it just takes maximum a first semester in political sciences for beginners to know that referendum is widely considered as potentially totally undemocratic. You know, would you like to vote to rip lgbt people off their rights to marry, (one of the traditional step to bring people to worse than serfage) novelty.

A referendum initiated by a pm premier representative that was against. Those customs desing to totally undermine any trust that someone may have in the act of voting. Won’t proceed. Just preceded by voting for Clegg who pledge to protect university fees, for doubling them the moment he acceded his vice office.a

You know why there is so much shambles in the house for Brexit. BECAUSE YOU DO NOT LAUNCH A REFERUMDUM THAT CHANGES THE LIFE AND FATE OF A WHOLE COUNTRY AND OF EVERY CITIZEN, OVER GENERATIONS AND GENERANTIONS, IN FACT OVER ITS ENTIRE, TILL THE END OF ITS FLOW (WHICH COULD BE SHORT ADMITTEDLY IN THE VIEW OF A kingDOM that ain’t that united, VOTING BY ONLY ONE GENERATION TOO (THE OTHER VOTERS WERE TOO BUSY BATTLING ON WITH REAL LIFE), WITHOUT AN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY BACKING IT.


A referendum initiated by a pm, premier representative that was against, or rather so he said, what the referendum propose to dramatically alter (or perhaps rob) = generations of efforts within what will always remain england’s continental neighbor. Those customs design in one song to totally undermine any trust that someone may have in the act of voting. Won’t proceed. Just preceded by voting for Clegg who had pledged to protect university fees, for doubling them the moment he acceded his vice office. A culture of overturned engagement and promises.

I am not a political scientist but I guess that the referendum would have been acceptable, it was not a question about human rights, it was not a question really debated, or if it had been the UK would have demonstrate lobbying for alternative policies and show their values, but of course if values are we are the best and we want to upgrade our empire velocity while the only thing that is really left is a linguistic dominion. Not ensured only by the mastering of a language but also the worst ethnical discrimination of demanding a native accent on it… …. ….. …….
To have elected a pm on this question may have legitimated the referendum but who would have dared?? If the referendum had a second run, the people who were happy with Europe, the people who are sick with politicians’ greediness and attention seeking behavior on their misdeed and inappropriateness for them to be validated would come and vote, also the ones who wanted to have a protest say. And I am sorry but also at a times when Scotland could have broken the uk. With a second tour a remain would assert what people call the people way. The oligarchs I say did it, the uk way. Belittling and hooligans, to arrange for their vassals to think they will have it till the end of millennia. Who think no one will spot their mafia because they haven't got the italian brands. spot-on, just like the rest, dealing in buildings and banks, to face austerity: it is so certain oldwash, speculation is passé. And to replace skin-heads with discreet stabbing cultures, and people (yes the europe of peoples, you wonder after that that no one wants to stay! () who believe they have been chosen even though they cannot articulate it. No need of extrem when one can become filthy rich, you just have to look at people or not to kill them with nothing that could be held against you if trials were the products of judges doing their job and not the deal of whatever you want to call those sl#pp#rs.

Yuppie, you want to divide the word, the world into peoples, then kill them all it would be quicker.
POW.
But it would be to forget that they may be of some utility.

Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.

It is so astonishing that a ‘president’, well PM in the uk, against such an idea, all the same launched the referendum abolishing decades of a continental construction, without even a fight. I mean ok we heard before this a lot about eurosepticism, but did we a lot about an exit? The exit I was aware of before this one, was the independence of Scotland, an inner problem within the uk, not with the uk and Europe. In fact the Scottish possibility of breaking up the UK, have been managed with such disdain, that I though, oh goodness let’s hope they won’t take it the wrong way. I was for them ‘remaining’ within the kingdom (just in pasing, now the uk won’t have a queen for much more longer and that phallocracy is coming back for one do not know how many centuries- as we forgot, the foreigners even more so, that old England haven’t had dispose of their monarchs- it is what the charms of women do [not mysogyn, at least, at last they have it officially and this won’t be written off by the catholic hierarchy)- oblivion is nice for a while but look at what was behind), because to pass the right law we need to be strong, but just like everybody else that is not fasho, I am so afraid of strong governments that would eradicate human rights when they are true.

What I think is now very much in the face of everyone is this hysteria (both from the uk, and in Europe now), reminding the 52% of votes for Brexit. They are hysterical because this referendum has been lynched this way by the leading party only because the absolutely knew the results. Not the result of the people but of people voting. No one any longer listens to the politicians, unless they are after a course or the path to take to a sad, sad, sadism - to have to stop listening to every politician, because 1 min on their recital, you know that you are leading into the most frightening and ugly ‘mode d’emploi’. How to get away and administer sinister and sin that will in the course of your career help ya.
That still vote in parallel to abject discourses hoping to set the tone or for a blue print architecting the managerial model- it is why the lies and contempt and derision, to make sure everyone understands every 1 to 3 min the amount of ruffianism that politician ideologies are drawing. Hooligans that pay for plans and projects to be unused, destructors, defeating-their-initial-purpose (the happiness of the people, of people?, of all- their well-being – not the one provided by the feeling you can be fed on the next ‘apparel’, peer, pareil) and puerile.

As for the freight about how gracious England could be to Northern Ireland, no surprise here, the uk being one of the European countries (yes, still top of the class) the most ‘lenient’ on trafficking, fracking and on sea polluting- human rights, aren’t they?
The present PM, say they want to bring food to the table of working people. Food is not only what one wants to live in dignity, and then, what work are we talking about? We know here in the uk, you can afford food, and after that you beg to the banks for a credit that only the privileged can repay, and to afford alongside for the honorable parents, their kids’ once hons hot university. The millions of pounds (austerity) thrown on projects that could be dealt by thousands? To say millions of pounds paying staff for a single teen, to see them only project that those grown-up are able to build being them not to absconds too systematically (the rate just below always is high enough for it to be a nightmare by social services ordained) into drugs, criminality, to rule their carers as a possibility to show further how handle work ethics, prostitution and teen pregnancy To make sure that the building (society) arranges the grandeur while the only right left will be to wrought for big businesses a zero hour of security freedom and intelligence permitted, in front or not of assemblies, knitted microcosms of inequity. Contract, comfortable for the head blood suckers that make vampire literary representation a pale attempt at depicting the horror that prevail amongst the humans without canines, without nothing but the opportunity. I am not sure that on this paragraph everyone would have a clear image of what it said, but I’ d be prepared to advance that that will come.
Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.


And then, I want to say, I know too little, on the reasons of the oligarchies ‘end march’ of all sites-sides-sizes-cides, in fact nothing to really guess why those elites would push through, in fact ‘push’ putsch, for Brexit.
What kind of secrecy or manipulation of what kind would surge and merge people who said no, but all of the sudden are as in American, shitting themselves as each vocab or vocal that would not suit the new in place dictactoriat. The fishermen in search of nurses more in hue of their view of what were the ware of Gutenberg and Saxe-Coburg.
Only international rivalry, the first days of alliances, and axis, multilateralism, isolationism,populism, liberalism and socialism all united, and for the work for the retards, all the bureaucracy that that will generate. A no laws for big business, taxes evasion paradises, when you know that some greedy French now are Russian civilians, why not Monaco on a rock more northern …some other have passports and native accents that made them eligible to global mobility- but beware angles, even for the modest jobs now, even the ones with the ‘right nationality’, with a passport passe-partout, just starts having to be good or reasonably operant at their job (at stopping politics that would like to see a politics not towards wars but towards nature, nurture, beauty and liberty). And the files that will make money, for the middle-man that does nothing but take the percentage, the agencies that will have us all cooped and bled (hoped led). The only survivors the one on their way to mars, and that won’t be Europeans.
A French say.

PS: and when uk kicks the people that serves her for years, learning a new LANGUAGE, thinking they only needed a decade more to get the jest, host, hoist, gest, sorry, gist, and that just realized when they understand the lingo that their native accents, the accent of their very mum, will be at the root of racial racaille ethnical discrimination, more and more acute, by the time everyone with a little empathy knows you spent your life, re-larnin lehren leering luring speaking to be taken like a child to a serf without other possibility (the traders of all nations maybe excluded from outcast endless engrossed negotiations, as they brought possibly and exchange new technics on how to rally goods without spending any time, work on good! Or anything but a faith of debauchery, here the art of mockery for one’s one prosperity in milking and snatching everything from thoughts, to health, trees, rise, (dignitas and endangered), to anger, piousness and properties.
The vampires of all countries will never suffer racism, as they bound, from all corners of our world, and round the rest up on slavery. With a strata a layer effect, have to stay and state realism, why, what better than one’s own castle and liturgy of what is to feed upon- for free (not liberty).
In plain language, do not kick people that came here, learn a new language, and that have nothing back to their countries of origin, but a diluted sense of how they used to speak during their tender years. Do not kick people that have done the bilingual epopee, to be treated like if Europe never has existed- they just did not get it what was to come on no income.

Trap, a strap,   through arson and assault to defend what they have been elected to be for (the forestall-stake, tell, talk, stage stale, ale toll---stood stool=stole) of that was a liberal coming to the government voted in to protect universities and academia against rising fees, for him to participate to the doubling of the fees- a reiterative pattern of betrays, a linear story- the same plot of no leader but executioner of democracy; the reminder, the reign of unsolvable staggering bourgeois bourgeon, feasting on dishonesty, die old stabbing, staging monarchy.
Plundering, abusing not only the vote of people but plainly how people get to build better and stronger activities.

Plot
Now they should be giving the lead to the opposition party? Yes, if you could trust one. One that would convey of this, and annul (annul the deal of the sudden sullen deserters, not the debt their same project managers made sure was exponentially, opponent, driven into buildings and no social protection, as they invest into laundry- money coming from the dirty of all shapes in forms- the cons and the ones that sweat blood to never go to hospital before dignitas may be taking the place as blessed token of patriarch philosophy. Politics would force the leader to do a second referendum, even though the first one should never have happened. Politics is not snatch and run. But no one or almost states it- and in any case not the opposition. So I am not saying it is the truth but to me, the REFerundum (hom, homo-sapiens or DUMb rather than DOM) refractory, refectory. Was a machination. Of all part-tease.
In haste with ease.

Not every information is academically sponsored and also follow the instinct suite therefore, but one cannot spend so long of search, quest and wonder about and around neglig-able, or at least so neglected territory.
Spelling it, personally I was so shocked that the uk left but after so many months, somewhat the childish hope that its ultra-liberalism, its mercantilism and market economy would not be so much used as a blue-print for the rest of Europe came to alleviate the angry agony.
After what Europe have done on the map as patron, including leaving people into concentration camp in Yugoslavia, and no need for vampire narrative, as no canines are needed to kill and torture they own country side (with the farmers breeds the cattle litany britanny, no trees are left so made the best of the marshes and grass is daring and cunning unprecedented) and their ex colonies. After macron whose French intellectuals say that it is the installation of financial and privatization oligarch napoleonic cliques. The uk coo coup some kind of post gold rush destiny.
DEMOCRACY IS ABOUT THE RIGHT AND DUTY OF THE PEOPLE, ‘HELL-EAT’ WOULD HAVE US TO BELIEVE THAT IT IS BALLOT AND NOTHING ELSE MUCH MORE COMPLICATED.

14-12-2018
Blogs’ dates have been changed in order to make appear the posts of higher importance, marasmus and emergency to the fore.

Across the world Anglophilia is giving way to Anglobemusement
This view has been shattered by Brexit. Foreigners increasingly talk about Britain in the way they would talk about an admired relative who has gone stark raving bonkers.
The first thing foreigners focus on is the sheer chaos of it all. “Isle of madness” is one headline from Der Spiegel. “A Shakespearean tragedy” is another from La Tribune.
The second thing is the amateurism. Britain was thought to have a Rolls-Royce government.

C.ET: who’s lost their standing, and whose ‘help’ do not know?
No, I would differ, still well humored they are the corn beef.
- aye darling your accent is charming, and all the ones of the nobles’ welcome as long as with money and above all for the prosperity and posterity with their barbary law.

Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.

All of that, could come to a contrast against what in the continent pupils have been told through images of a standing straight wearing tweed, discreetly amicable, at least to me, teaching (like the only job will have now oversee-seize-seas) respectable lady.
Like if one, everyone or the vast majority did not need help to prevent the MPs and their sponsors and mafias of all countries taxing the common people into their own very interest: people’ s disempowerment and poverty deployed versus richness coming from, well I am not here to list or enlist what we did on this dormant earth- deprived now of everything that even without books, animals of all perceptions, measure and abilities will know, will realise by the thousands evidence throw at them and their absence of descents that they let live a hoist that no intelligence could desire as partner on no day- that thanks to us will be irremediably suffering the hell humans fabricated.
And also to flee(ce) the European community through the back door, without a gesture towards fighting for a better EU, without a debate, without a stance first- only making sure or trying to have no debts to be repaying, lacks so much of distinction that it might well be this that will remain in the annals of political history- historical hysterical. Poise on.

And officialese, in terms of Brexit, sometimes often, bbc does not say much about things, but bbc 4 at least has a whole program a month about gambling addictions taken to a severe level of oblivion in the uk.
SMUGGLERS: As for the backstop and the border of Ireland- that ain’t brits as a reinder for the non-assertive asset adverted-, surely the uk would not consider becoming a back door to any traffic, a bit like North Korea (after who have surrounded Tibet, the water can of all Asiai am not sure if that was in return for Hong-Kong or what, to China?: not the com) or other terrorism linked.
Smuggling is chic from or for one merchandised market that ban(e) benefits (feat a tantrum and seizure) already from all the best deals, rates and laissez-passers.
From the contempt you can read that the ENG mocked the Irish, mocked the Scottish, and on top they ain’t even the English, just like the trails of tears, no English remains on this land name great England. Now, will be damned those who profit from a land instead of serving her, like patriotism says (see ya) of itself it is about. Damned and condemn pathetic conmen.



Cor(ps).

Latin: Cor (coram) 'In the presence of the people'

And also astonishingly, what ‘journalists’ use to calling arena (Arian), is nothing of the sort. It is like now, no one who was for a remain is to fight for it for any longer (monger) length of time. They all swapped down to their knickers and vests combi to one with which they will be way more comfortable to wall people onto the rim like the animals they despise and disposed of- just there remaining, left to represent what life is worth thus for those connies -ethic with ease-. No talking about Brexit but parliaments in general. People did not have trust, the votes will be now utilised as cut-throating legislation that instead of being illegal, just like the sharia and western work contract that will make impossible a living, will through passing, through endless reorganisation between centers of power (see our neighbour, councils, lords and boroughs) made us make us deservingly into extension-extinction. In sum, what now everything is crumbling and that species already had done everything they could undo with mining-collapsing. Like the poo-poed-pee-piss of a trump – a far outcry evolution mark from wat he would have come up with: poopoopeepeethankyoumummy, and its choirs repeating it (may that, part.ners and followers alike chock on their own s- craps and s-hits) isself hera.lded by many others and by those multi-billionaires Mormons, polygamous and the us heavily into porn and prostitution calling for trials like the ones that polluted the amazon by chevron, calling for lorries of documents to be delivered to release an uncontroversially (not uncontrollable) devil, more than winning, in all glory of the ones by the elites (yes the hell-hits) supported. but until now still ghee the US stood as international dreams. And now?? No people, no person will never dare to differ again since the mafia more than made it, it owns it.
Differ / faire= do in french that would put the verb do a relic of the past until politics of pollution will have us tres-passed.
The name is a pit, but the snake’s main dinner won’t be in between those inbreed despotic nepotist brainless governors. And it won’t be the tumour.

Speaking of which, the pits or marshland let’s hope will suit vegetables and more than only pumkins and squash- for those who have for centuries the lambs laid and slain, the same one they say they would serve- and not galvanise themselves through farms, pharmaceutics, and genetics-or eugenics again- in view of more commercial – validated!- slaughtering that hopefully will soon see our logical oblivion, washing, dissemination- not insemi (it seems that the seeds of horrification sown seldom sick seduction submissionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss). Arch sacked, Sank.


With the planes that will replenish the atmosphere layers. The planes that the neo-nazis cannot miss liking as they kill the poorest, the southest of all islands. And the ports that will all belong to empires bought by china for Africa. So about airports why on earth complain?

This BUNCH hilariously jesting on democracy and the will of people that are once pull forward (not when (ex) education become or remain unaffordable- no, that won’t disturb or disrupt the lords). No one is for any split second of a ram -random- remain and except because they are not politicians in web minister but just forgers why????
Because WE ARE WITNESSING THE ONGOING NOT BATTLE BUT ORDELY COEHESION OF A PARLIAMENT THAT BY A REFERUNDUM STARTED THE PROCESS OF GIVING MORE AND MORE POWER TO ITSELF. POWER, SOME OF IT, AND THE LEGITIMATE ONE THAT TRY TO PROTECT FOR EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT TO ALLOW INSECTICIDES DECIMATING THE BEES LIKE ENGLAND HAS DONE, LEGITIMATE, WHEN IT WAS, A POWER IN ANY CASE HAD BEEN DEVOLVED TO EUROPE-THE REGION. AND NOW EXIT FROM IT MEANS BLUNTLY THAT THIS POWER WILL COME BACK TO WHOM??? NOT THE EUROPEAN MP A LOT TRYING TO BREAK EUROPE OR BRINGING BACK THE AXIS BUT TO THE PARLIAMENT- themselves now sole guarantor, defender and definer of their own cor-o-nation, (and s.audi collaboration explained sharia law all over the outlet and outland England as it stays while and after shatting wales and Scotland, what will be left? The commoner wealth) TO THEIR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHERE THEMSELVES AND FRIENDS WILL BE SO QUIET TO FAKE, TAKE. Ache is a word of the past, as the past has some horizon. Heck-lures.
For just one in brakets: one can go on, on and on, against ill islam and its sharia, pedophilia, slavery, that is thin and think inner to it. But for the moment the ones who permits sharia law in England are not the muslims on themselves. Not stopping the responsible for that while increasing islamophobia, while islam could soon become compulsory for the rest of it is what?? Nazis and castrated (of which I am, enable to do one single thing against the plague of child marriages to list again that one, and on which they are right, it is not pedophilia it is worst than that, pedophilia can be stopped and cure, and disarmed not one cult combining millions that are respected and in power and expanding in all manners on top of that- soringly sorry but I am not the one venerating a pedo and sex slave owner being adorated by millions and protected by billions by what people self-called  tolerant instead of scelerat (French for polluted, soiled, miserable, rogue coming criminal.)



TAKing, Ta king.
BREXIT IS AN ONGOING TAKing OVER OF A POWER THAT HAD BEEN DEVOLVED TOWARDS COOPERATION WITHin A BIGGER TERRITORY – COOPERATION ABOUT WHICH NOONE KNOWS, AT LEAST NOT THE ANYONE LISTENING TO MAIN STREAM WEBMINSTER COMMUNICATION ON EUROPEAN HISTORY (apart the fact that the UK royals are of german descent- german who have historically been themselves the one best ally of the ottomans, it is a relief for the sole French culpability on collaboration [even though the French have been regarding themselves as the epitome of resistance]- let’s now hope it is because they were surrounded not fully engaged).

It is perhaps why the deal quick exit has been postponed in that end year of 2018, because since revolutions people have coined to beware the speed and peerage of passions. ABM then what would do your patriots but selling their teaching cap-ability and then play a peep ‘an englishp(e)ers-on in New-York’.


LE-AVE.





CHOSE VEGANISM, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. 




Sunday, April 1, 2018

SHARIA LAW


SHARIA LAWS

All the more because staying Muslim is deadly compulsory in Muslim countries, I want here to precise again, that of course, not all Muslims are favourable to this version of Islam and could lay their faith on the Coran only or would stop regarding the life of Islam’s prophet as being an example and model. But to be realistic, it would be, one very difficult to rationalise it and only sieve within the body of work that is regarded as edifying this creed. Two, to succeed retaining only the humane would have to be, in a tradition that in fact has totally iconised for centuries (to the point of revering only one figure, and desacralizing all other pictures) who they call the last prophet (and its lines, hereditary families or those of other historical figures linked to the expansion and colonisation of Islam, here to add that until even now, and so by extinction the last century Islam was in fact colonising and becoming compulsory for millions of people in country side all other several continents, who were attached to their own beliefs, traditions and ways of life, who would never have had read the coran or gone to a Mosque-    that islam being newly in favour is a myth as it has been the instrument for centuries of colonisation, that islam is in fact the belief of all since then is a myth as genuine people on their lands, in mountains and urban areas did not know and rather have been violated by a creed that was and still is medievalistically and imperialistically imposed unto them) and therefore his life (polygamy, slavagist, rapist….) would, and in attempting forced conversions even more, only temporary.
It is suffocating to hear most of the followers of Islam talking about Mohammed their guide, as if it was in fact the pillar of their movements. All these guys, and ladies, claiming and sounding the bugle for their icon and models everywhere, and on main stream media, who do not lift a single finger, who do not make any attempt at clarify for their stupefied audience, what is, what it means, its tenor.
Tenure, when the tool falling for abuses is a term.
Terminus.


Sharia Law

Shariah lawSharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelledShari'a or Shariah) law is cast from Muhammad's words, called "hadith," his actions, called "sunnah," and the Quran, which he dictated. 
According to Sharia law (see links for details):
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the hands (Quran 5:38).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the 
Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing 
Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see 
Allah moon god).
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (See 
Compulsion).
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A woman or girl who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• Testimonies of 4 male witnesses are required to prove rape of a female (
Quran 24:13).
• A woman or girl who alleges rape without producing 4 male witnesses is guilty of adultery.
• A woman or girl found guilty of adultery is punishable by death (see "
Islamophobia").
• A male convicted of rape can have his conviction dismissed by marrying his victim.
• Muslim men have sexual rights to any woman/girl not wearing the 
Hijab (see Taharrush).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; 
Muhammad can have more.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 
9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (
Muhammad's words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see 
Quran 4:34 and Religion of Peace).
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a wife needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see 
Mathematics in Quran).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be "
Halal."
• Muslims should engage in 
Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• 
The list goes on (see Sharia law in AmericaCanadaEurope and UK).
The number of countries penetrated by Sharia law continues to grow, as does the depth of its penetration in the countries already affected. 



Stop believing what Muslims tell us about Islam (see Taqiyya).
There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (the Shia name).  These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them. 

Al-Taqiyya, Dissimulation




C.ET:       the mistake what is made by the people countering Sharia law is that they want to fight against islam as a whole, while we have to fight all against any types of exploitation, racisms, all forms of discriminations, and ways humans have to exploit others- be them humans, animals, nature and believes- whatever, however this exploitation name might be or take.
Can Muslims be executed for converting?
Apostasy, or leaving the faith, is a very controversial issue in the Muslim world and experts say the majority of scholars believe it is punishable by death.
The Koran itself declares there is "no compulsion" in religion.


 

c: AS usual the BBC will tackle a subject given looming headlines at best like here, but as almost always just talking about 30 years old issues as had it be avant-garde the like of, and this way give the false impression that subjects are reviewed without a say. I mean ok, recent very good BBC reports on Chinese censorship, could come from their having censored themselves there, in Honk-Kong, but who told you that Muslim if following the life style of their prophet will have to torture, rape and killed, well once they are the sultans in a swing.

Us all. Use all.

 

  

 
















 ‘We believed he would be in jail for life’: the story behind John Worboys’ imminent – and baffling – release

She said: "It feels far too soon for this dangerous and manipulative perpetrator to be released into the public having served this woefully short time in prison.
She told the Andrew Marr Show: "I fully recognise why people are concerned about this.
"We want to ensure that victims feel confident enough to come forward, so that they feel confident that the police will take action, and confident that they will get justice.






Amber Rudd rejects calls to legitimise sharia courts over fears for UK laws

HOME Secretary Amber Rudd has rejected calls to legitimise sharia “courts” in Britain.

PUBLISHED: 22:20, Thu, Feb 1, 2018


C.ET:       about the article above, if you wish look at this soup but it is just not convincing. It is the unbearable approach of a government covering for scandals such as Saville, P.I.E, absence of intervention by police and social services allowing grooming perpetrated against teenagers, and the fact that the UK is one of the best countries to grow human trafficking, the very recent release of ‘public enemy number 1’ such as Worboys, by judges still roaming the streets, in the so called courts, take apart common sense to gain again more room for the regime of fear that has loomed and keep drawing.

Numb facing fear, and its shaping.



Theresa May told the Andrew Marr Show: "I fully recognize why people are concerned about this.
It is just like May saying that they are concerned for the death in the blaze in the London borough provoked by unfitted buildings, under the supervision of millionaire bosses or managers imbeciles. They did not say we will chase, and punish people building death traps for others, they did not say that they will inspect other consturc.
Not in fact in the uk, ans certainly in many other countries, since any how it is lethat capitalism that is the leadr of today’s policy, every one who knows how affairs and maters of life and business are managed, by all these blue print managers that are representated by the politicians, who do not represent the people but l the dishonest people and the way the country is misled- all examples of speech of how it is allowed in fact dictated on how you have to deal and mistreat customers, collegues, trainees, senior, juniors, qualified, newcomers, experts, whistleblowere and fired and  firms.

Just a little text “poetry: to tsay I don’t even listen to 1 min of them, because even in 1 split it has too much one can take of si distate and dismay of a dictact that seem so pround , stable and unsanely slay.



C.ET:     I admit I stopped trying to analyse any politicians discourses, because there is nothing or too much going on. They are just for every each of them, a big calorific slices of treachery, class abuses, patronizing theories that are unintelligent, disrespectful and have for sole function to dictacte the way the today’s (each time hopefully temporary- but in repetition of the same frog roos gross grotestque imbecility there is no temporarity. Just temporal hell changed into secular templar, with guys with airs of sacro-sacn sanct devility.






Between Cameroon who unc cries on the front to the nation and those of the cameras at the death of his son, slashing financial help for kids in the uk. While the rich and ambitious royal ambitiously flirts with expansionist emperors like china, uk is top countries of child poverty.
And the only time he seems to speak to somebody, except when per preparing Brexit through debilitation speech at English and Scottish, pissing thus on UK integrity.

WHILE WE HEARD A THOUSAND TIMES, THAT THE REFERENDUM IS THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS BY EXCELLENCE, THE WHY THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WILL STOP BEING A PART OF EUROPEAN POLITICS. THE FIRST THING ONE LEARN ABOUT IT, IS THAT IT IS VERY ARGUABLE THAT REFERENDUM ARE DEMOCRATIC. THE FIRST THING ONE LEARNS IN DEMOCRACY STUDY. AS FOR THE ONES WHO LET THE GAY MARRIAGES BEING A VOTE MATTERS, THEY ARE IN FACT, FASCIST. GAY MARRIAGE IS SIMPLY A BEING. BEING LAWFULLY THE EQUAL OF THE OTHERS, HAVE THE RIGHT TO MARRY. ONLY THIS IS NOT GIVEN TO PEOPLE IN STATE OF SLAVERY.

(out of the complete shock of loss, losing the uk, maybe now Europeans will feel relief at not having a loose toss to emulate the uk creating so many inequalities and poverties, and the concentration of richness and the spread of core crookeries, disempowerment and unfairness.) it won’t happen because many English think they are the navel, so few Europeans people have the slightest ideas of what is going on, on a land where people claim human rights as the possibility for FGM and enslavement.

Knowing the uk a little bit, just has to pray that it is less the case or not the case elsewhere, but let’see what they mean by utopia. )



While the Stephen King’s ‘IT’ of UK politics, previously mayor of London and current Foreign secretary, who made impossible for a working class to pay the transportation taking them to work and places where they can gathering around other themes than communities.




















Above all in alma mater London where no go zone for police, not due to Islamic violence, but politics, that protect rich borough from crimes but not poor ones. Where stabbing flourish in some while the police reside in south London, protecting the sole hope for the free uk, their airports…    
While the opposition promised to its very best, to give power to the many.


The new Monaco, or Catalagne who now, that has been for decades praised and admired because people, normal, the fair ones, can stand a few generations of females being king, because we had to be relieved at the apparition of feminity (not too many generations though because their presence mean that war propelled inequality and insecurity, injustice and the need for a sword that capriciously sway). But now dear England is about to see a male for heir, what better shame can hope the distinguished that quit their continent without as much as a debate. Yet caution to give an idea, the first thing that I have learnt in democracy studies well before 2016, is that referendum are not by nature democratic, just like people are asked to decide if equal marriage is the thing, or why not whether universal suffrage is the next to be…eradicate. 
The royalists (and their imitators) callings to other kings such as the saoudi and imperialist china to import/exports their teachings.

The royalists (and their imitators) callings to other kings such as the saoudi and imperialist china to import/exports their teachings. While having for big brother a people that claimed to be the world police and that is as a general rule not part of any significant treaty. Of which the president is as negationist as some old Europeans would have negate the shoa. Better in fact as everyone can see in any place how nature is dying from being in the care of what should stop bearing any of that. Imagine…animals understanding, and now in every inch, of this planted planet that they left this species as the king? No, so as wah what?



THE MOST FAMOUS HISTORICAL USE:

“Tyranny of the Majority.” (“Tyrannie De La Majorité”) 





I am a vegan and I respect vegetarians profoundly for not creating flesh in hell each time they have to fill their body. but here you are. 


Here you are why IT IS SO GOOD TO BE ACCUSED OF ANTISEMITISM, BECAUSE OF THE MUSLIMS VOTE. I AM NOT saying vote from Pakistanis, Indians, Iranians or of any particular countries, I AM SAYING MUSLIMS. AND SOME CHRISTIANS. AND OF EVERYBODY THAT WILL END UP IN CHAINS-voting for the worst of system.



So how is it not a hate speech then? refer please to the scriptures of their prophets. For example, because in Islam other religions must pay a tax. 
For me, any groups i.e. including religions (the same for the Jewish obviously) that proffer or organise the exploitation or servitude of any others is illegitimate- be them included into their groups or not- as forced hetero marriages, as it is what they are, and forbidden free relationships by any means societies have found- you do not have to care about people you killed in their personal lives, for them all have died, and how could they gather to prevent more to happen? 













Quote/Counterquote: “Tyranny of the majority” vs. “tyranny of the ...
www.quotecounterquote.com/2010/08/tyranny-of-majority-vs-tyranny-of.html
6 Aug 2010 - Two decades before that, Voltaire had used the similar phrase “tyranny of the many” (“tyrannie de plusieurs”) in his Philosophical Dictionary (1764). MAJORITY VIEWPOINT: “The tyranny of the minority is infinitely more odious and intolerable and more to be feared than that of the majority.” William McKinley ...

Tyranny Of The Majority Quotes (1 quote) - Goodreads
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/tyranny-of-the-majority
Yet where absolute monarchs had failed, democracy succeeds, for the strength of the majority is unlimited and all pervasive, and the doctrines of equality and majority rule have substituted for the tyranny of the few over the many the more absolute, imperious and widely accepted tyranny of the many over the few.”

THE MOST FAMOUS HISTORICAL USE:
“Tyranny of the Majority.” (“Tyrannie De La Majorité”)
       Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859)
       French historian and political pundit
       Title of a section in Chapter XV of his book Democracy in America (1835)
       Tocqueville’s use of the phrase “Tyranny of the Majority” in his famed book about his travels in America is often credited as its origin. In fact, it had been used before. For example, it appears in one of the “Letters of Agrippa,” the American anti-federalist documents believed to be written by James Winthrop in the late 1780s. The Agrippa letter dated February 5, 1788 says: “A bill of rights...serves to secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.” Two decades before that, Voltaire had used the similar phrase “tyranny of the many” (“tyrannie de plusiers”) in his Philosophical Dictionary (1764).



Tyranny of the majority - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
1.       
2.       
Tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) refers to an inherent weakness of direct democracy and majority rule in which the majority of an electorate can and does place its own interests above, and at the expense of, those in the minority.

LSE BREXIT – Thanks to the referendum, the tyranny of the majority ...

blogs.lse.ac.uk/.../thanks-to-the-referendum-the-tyranny-of-the-majority-has-prevaile...
1.       
2.       
28 Jul 2016 - The notion of the tyranny of the majority was popularised by the 19th century political thinkers Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It refers to a situation in which the majority enforces its will on a disadvantaged minority through the democratic process.

tyranny of the majority - Jstor

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40982538
by FA HERMENS - ‎1958 - ‎Cited by 2 - ‎Related articles
various minority groups that compose a modern state, be they of a religious, racial, social, or political character. Thomas Wood- lock said at one time that "Democracy is the protection of minori- ties through the rule of the majority." The reason is to be found in the simple fact that it takes members of manyminorities to.

Tyranny of the majority - Wikiquote

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
1.       
2.       
Tyranny of the majority. ... It involves a scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting active oppression comparable to that of a tyrant or despot. This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikiquote by expanding it.

The tyranny of the majority | The Economist

www.economist.com/node/15127600
1.       
2.       
17 Dec 2009 - Put differently, it is the “tyranny of the majority” that James Madison, a Founding Father, warned about. His reading of ancient history was that the direct democracy of Athens was erratic and short-lived, whereas republican Rome remained stable for much longer. He even worried about using the word ...



AND ON why like the opposing party’s leader of the UK in 2018, one could be helped in their campaign, passing or signing as anti-Semitic. Because Christianity (according to Paul in particular, or at least for the one I know) and of course Islam are renowned to be so.



And just to re-say it, in view of the western propaganda on Palestine. Not on the appaling conditions Palestinians live in, but on the fact that Israel is surrounded by Islamic countries whose laws you will need to search further to understand the danger for the basic human rights they represent expotienally. To state oneself as antisemit (and god know I am for no religion in particular, as they all proved to be biased in violence or in what they preach is peace. Well declaring oneself antisemit could be so good for someone wooing another creed. Not naming let see… nay maybe nothing in particular, just all of them pleading for communities to be the new or renewed tyranny.








 

 

Criticism of Muhammad

Muslim slavery continued for centuries

The legality of slavery in Islam, together with the example of the Prophet Muhammad, who himself bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves, may explain why slavery persisted until the 19th century in many places (and later still in some countries). The impetus for the abolition of slavery came largely from colonial powers, although some Muslim thinkers argued strongly for abolition.



Ownership of slaves

Treatment of enemies


Norman Geisler accuses Muhammad of "mercilessness" towards the Jewish tribes of Medina.[80] Geisler also argues that Muhammad "had no aversion to politically expedient assassinations," "was not indisposed to breaking promises when he found it advantageous" and "engaged in retaliation towards those who mocked him."[80] The Orientalist William Muir, in assessing Muhammad's character, described him as cruel and faithless in dealing with his enemies.[81][Note 1]

 

 

 

Muhammad and Islam's Sex Slaves

As for "theological reasons" for sex slavery "according to the Sharia," these are legion—from male Muslim clerics, to female Muslim activists. Generally they need do no more than cite the clear words of Koran 4:3, which permit Muslims to copulate with female captives of war, or ma malakat aymanukum, "what"—not whom—"your right hands possess."










NEWS 
21/04/2017 10:48 AM IST | Updated 21/04/2017 10:50 AM IST

Watch: Mob That Killed Pakistan Student Mashal Khan For Alleged Blasphemy Celebrates His Death



C.ET:            what has been a lot cited, is not even the fact that Khan has been killed but that he has been killed whilst not evidence of him blaspheming had been found. In many sources, BBC included, Khan is identified as a faithful believer of Islam rather than as a victim of freedom of opinion, religion and political parties.
VERY VERY FRIGHTENING.

Eggland, whose treatment of the scots resembled like nothing, with their PM talking to all of them like if they were disposable infants, while concocting the referendum that would allow all politicians to sugar the back room enough to take an herr heir airplane ticket and just go out of a country that will frack, farm, milk till abrasion what is left of a dynasty that half last century made bearable, because, just because, a woman had the spectra (though we would go tired of women, even though alone), and now ready to see another man to lead the only living symbol left of a realm that stand through the universal attraction to ………….their language, not hoping their idioms.
When one thinks they have to get ready for patriarchy of the kind that do not go to war bug just marry.
Haye, hail.      To v##l.
That ain’t reveal.