Translate

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Add info on roe save the world and h.r (human rights) condition 2.

Add info on roe save the world and h.r (human rights) condition 2.




I d like to thank the academics, our teachers as my only point was to convey the fact that an all area, a whole discipline were disappearing from the English speaker higher education, and never appeared in other languages at it is a discipline name after globalization. I have been told that quite frankly they did not know that I was talking about, thus being surely caused by a problem of clarity and expression.



Human Rights (h.r)



And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

"Professor Paul O'Prey, vice-chancellor at Roehampton University, had a 21 per cent pay rise to £218,000, (now on £246,000) as well the 'tax-free benefit' of a home." (Daily Mail) We should have unit, your site has been a model of disorganization.

Read and read, people were reading reading, what had been done. Nothing, not a single action. We will, we will, we will, not a single report, conclusion, warning, resume, nothing.

But it makes sense though human rights is being scrapped that means that jobs related too. It is a coup that you were enacting. We take the subject we pass for a work group, with little titles and so and son.

We do make believe that the subjects is fought for, etc, while we are condemning after ignoring any kind of effort. Hacking, jelly mandering, obscurantism, cheap insolence = to say oneself the boss and darwf any way people want to participate in by doing nothing while monopolizing the reins, ok…

in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

viva the old building industry! i d b curious enough to check which mps or civil servant, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.



About the students having started a campaign that no one wanted to let know by the public, as it would have taken real work, but what they did is launching a site, whose bureau was an office of strict members impeaching other decision-makers or team leader or parallel thinking to enter what was supposed to be a fight (the last resort fight). Their actions? Looking for support from famous grand professionals (looking for contacts and entering organisations), in drawing a petition that is in fact praising their universities instead of combating the fact this university draw to their leaders, millions of pounds that were supposed to be dedicated to human rights- among a glass brand new building of 4 floors that from the beginning were not used by human rights or agencies or researchers or students, no human rights inside but two spared rooms and scattered tutorials) while these same leaders, academics, share-holders, were knowing that human rights as a speciality were to be scrapped and would last no longer than 6 odd years.

At these students that saw their speciality knocked down on her knees without reacting even a little but for concealing the importance of what was happening.

No more human rights at the university level, should have become a national matter. We were 50 students or so, 4 full time profs, and a dozen others mixed with other speciality. It never came out of a play-acting petition and all the fuss in the formality that discussion should take and stay.





On profs, academic of human rights, doing nothing, at least they could have launch a campaign of information, at least an article in a journal, informing the post cold war population about human rights execution, without even having to accuse their employers to nick with grandiloquence, not grams but tons of the last instance.

On the council of the university scrapping h.r and giving delay on discussion like if they were something to say. H.r and matters don’t derive from the need for human development and higher instance no longer but on the book mad makers that will tell you what you need, what you get, how do you do, and how you do, in order to survive till die from lust or then vain labor.

I think it is Weber, who explained that administrative power detain a huge power- possibly tenfold those of the political power- by inertia, stubbornness, refusal to co-operate, counter-productivity, neglect...j en passe et des meilleurs , there is no wonder why horrors and worse than horrors, occurrences and recurrences to which you cannot give a name, hell forbids-how can one authorize that?, went and went in the past and are here rejoicing in our everyday- tasks.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.



On the site of the students being anti democratic as such as professing lies and discarding other considerations that whose of a self appointed committee.

A simple, simple, basic test on democracy.

We are told that there is no other options, that there is no more students, which is not true, and anyhow, who are these manager enough incompetent for failing to promote human rights, in high schools. And you will send your child learn sociology out of this dictatorial mentality.

It is not a university – guardian of the knowledge that has to be stored, helped, dissiminate, guardian herself of the people, creatures and matters from whom that all thought comes out.

Because let’s go back to Plato, well before the ‘’Christianity area’’, what was he adamant about, ce pion la?

He talked about the duties of the civil servants to defend with all their heart, intelligence, and energy, the field and the humanist purpose of the field or function they have been given the honour of being entrusted with.

Cf: Socrates, poison, academy.

But let’s talk about trust, this word, so much cheered by the stake-holders.

Because do we really know the staff, state and civil society around the concept of human rights, and in this case its study. Are they entrepreneurs, stake holders, servants or owners, do you get that?

How come people very seemingly in charge with the department of H.R ( i made the point that H.R were already treated as a scarcity, don’t I?) don’t convey you, me, our proofs, ropes, roofs and fproof, the other profs, the other students, the opinion public, maybe, by a simple invitation?

Why can’t we discuss this subject? More than a subject, this palpable reality.



Because they are afraid, they don’t want to melt, they don’t want supervision, they don’t want clarity, what they want is simplicity- simplification and awe, Laura, for the Duschene re-mark, thank you.



And when you recall the head of sociology and human rights insisting on the fact that the only human rights are freedom of expression, (denigrating rights as justice, share, redistribution, right to peace and life, right to a living a prospering environment for humans and other species...) while his own department will have to watch the finitude of their specialities without been able to utter a world or if not you loose your seats and chairs, mes petits.









hey i said big bugger, not big fucker. Gutter?



it is in rereading save hr that reminded me that your sense of humour could be limited though. this campaign did not deserve to be name more than a joke don't think? Don’t e.









• Darren O'Byrne

I hear that the new residents of the Duchesne building, which used to house Crucible, will be the postgrad/research team from the Business School. Good people, and good offices. May I wish you all the best in those fantastic spaces. I do hope someone acknowledges that CETL capital funding was diverted from a Southlands extension to rescue the rebuilding of the old Mandela bulding to create Duchesne. So the University has benified from the CETL money and should acknowledge this somehow.





May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard workng scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies.



Now, I talk to the interested directly, I came from the very first day, am law-abiding, not a total wreck, maybe.

I was here the first day of the college presentation, in this fantastic lecture room without tables.

It is a bit difficult for the mature student to stay focus in this condition, I work uniquely with my back and for longer that I thought would be, derision.

You talk(ed) a lot about business, ce jour-ci.

Human rights is right your business too, is it?

I calm myself each time hearing the name of business, thinking there is fair trade, t inquiete pas.

Because without human rights, the true ones, the noble, the ones that are to the service of individuals, their protectors-actions and the whole living universe, to the service of and served by any; because without human rights the business baby would be all and crooky.

Crooky, our baby?

I am homo, and when someone say to me that heteros are the ones fit for bringing up children, the answer is that one could retrieved the heirs from the tip of the rubbish or the trip of made famine and thief fifa family where she/he is left- but no, no possible there is health and safety.

I know the state of our toilets, the marble replacing the brand new ones already.

The state of your desk I guess it.





Please go vomit or cry in the nature please, as for primary, zero emission fertilizer, as recycling is still pollution, justement.

Consider the environment.



On student congratulating themselves:

i say you can try till you are blue in the face, but my friend have you tried of the ones you are so intimately linking with, what do you imply that they half have tried really? too nice of you this patently.





















On fees raising.

hi, i think you might forget the new toilets (still without opening windows- mind if you breathe deeply in London street, your flesh will be chemically hurt and stop rapidly-maybe are we preserved from the fresh air, we could attempt to ask actually) in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

viva the old building industry! i d b curious enough to check which mps or civil servant, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.









Student knew, they had been warned that their classes were the last one in the whole uk and English speaking countries, that instead of the one stuff they did in the campaign (pain) they launch a petition,

About the students having started a campaign that no one wanted to let know by the public, as it would have taken real work, but what they did is launching a site, whose bureau was an office of strict members impeaching other decision-makers or team leader or parallel thinking to enter what was supposed to be a fight (the last resort fight). Their actions? Looking for support from famous grand professionals (looking for contacts and entering organisations), in drawing a petition that is in fact praising their universities instead of combating the fact this university draw to their leaders, millions of pounds that were supposed to be dedicated to human rights- among a glass brand new building of 4 floors that from the beginning were not used by human rights or agencies or researchers or students, no human rights inside but two spared rooms and scattered tutorials) while these same leaders, academics, share-holders, were knowing that human rights as a speciality were to be scrapped and would last no longer than 6 odd years.

At these students that saw their speciality knocked down on her knees without reacting even a little but for concealing the importance of what was happening.

No more human rights at the university level, should have become a national matter. We were 50 students or so, 4 full time profs, and a dozen others mixed with other speciality. It never came out of a play-acting petition and all the fuss in the formality that discussion should take and stay.

On your petition I admit I could have been start of a strategy starring roehampton as a center of excellence, as it is so tiny but minute, but the sole on the land uk.

But not to mention that it was the only left, after this subject as been asked and asked again to appear in your theme. For you to refuse to do it and thus ruining any chances for being taken seriously. I am not old enough perhaps to grasp your motives entirely.





On profs, academic of human rights, doing nothing, at least they could have launch a campaign of information, at least an article in a journal, informing the post cold war population about human rights execution, without even having to accuse their employers to nick with grandiloquence, not grams but tons of the last instance.

On the council of the university scrapping h.r and giving delay on discussion like if they were something to say. H.r and matters don’t derive from the need for human development and higher instance no longer but on the book mad makers that will tell you what you need, what you get, how do you do, and how you do, in order to survive till die from lust or then vain labor.



I d like here (to) ask a question, to all of you.

It is about the aim of these courses, there are about human rights, mmh?

Human rights are also about democracy, it is not about the dictactorship of the majority the subject ici.

There are human rights and they are their defenders. Who are you?

I mean we risk the department closure, and there is even not a meeting.

I am not talking to the students but their professors.

What is going happen during ‘the judgment’, the kangaroo more, between the admin and you? Behind the curtain? Is it clear, cette foie-ci?

i am talking to you, you keep on posting political engagement rhetoric but you see here apparently, at least on what we could have, or that could have a counter-power precisely, it is more to do with an administrative matter.

I think it is Weber, who explained that administrative power detain a huge power- possibly tenfold those of the political power- by inertia, stubbornness, refusal to co-operate, counter-productivity, neglect...j en passe et des meilleurs , there is no wonder why horrors and worse than horrors, occurrences and recurrences to which you cannot give a name, hell forbids-how can one authorize that?, went and went in the past and are here rejoicing in our everyday- tasks.

There is no too much problem understanding why they go on, and it is not all the fault of the guys with the same job as Obama’s.



Let’s talk about admin, now. You know after the full cooperation of the French with Hitler’s views, after the second WW, one started having their go at them. But not too much because with the cold war, there were another race, an economic one, la productivite. And the ex collaborators the one with the speculative money.

What did Laura say, they boost the economy. Artificially. You think that it is in line with the Human Rights, vraiment, really?

Let’s not be too ambitious, for a beginning, will you?





On the sole moves done when announcement of the subjects’ condemnation, was a meeting telling the students that university will be providing for them till the end of their year of study, gracefully.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.



On the site of the students being anti democratic as such as professing lies and discarding other considerations that whose of a self appointed committee.

A simple, simple, basic test on democracy.

We are told that there is no other options, that there is no more students, which is not true, and anyhow, who are these manager enough incompetent for failing to promote human rights, in high schools. And you will send your child learn sociology out of this dictatorial mentality.

Don’t you think that it is dubious, (is it politically correct?) Let’s say procedural, the due process of Law, ca ira.

Let’s keep track of the question:

There is no a single meeting, yes the principal of the southlands college, dropping her line, may no.

Yes, it would be enough for you, me and the others, everyone to loose their job, as soon as we question that.

It is not a university – guardian of the knowledge that has to be stored, helped, dissiminate, guardian herself of the people, creatures and matters from whom that all thought comes out.

Because how to question? On this website? Na.

It is on their faces, that we could try to arrange all that. Jurisprudence, keep it in mind, this and the fact that one should give their souls for the vast question as much as the ones treated, put down as being littler. On cleaning jobs. (in fact it is an attempt at killing the fundamental importance on how people clean let’s say- letting people using liters of chemical poisons, just to say, you will do it like dummies, your work is shit anyway. This mean that instead of having the honour of cleansing for the community to meet (like Gandhi) and do it against a valuable, honourable, healthy share, One is obliged to do it in poisoning themselves and the future generations, like bandits, worst than highway daylight ruffian.

But did you notice, can you ask these people, what is going to happen precisely?

Because let’s go back to Plato, well before the ‘’Christianity area’’, what was he adamant about, ce pion la?

He talked about the duties of the civil servants to defend with all their heart, intelligence, and energy, the field and the humanist purpose of the field or function they have been given the honour of being entrusted with.

Cf: Socrates, poison, academy.

But let’s talk about trust, this word, so much cheered by the stake-holders.

Because do we really know the staff, state and civil society around the concept of human rights, and in this case its study. Are they entrepreneurs, stake holders, servants or owners, do you get that?

How come people very seemingly in charge with the department of H.R ( i made the point that H.R were already treated as a scarcity, don’t I?) don’t convey you, me, our proofs, ropes, roofs and fproof, the other profs, the other students, the opinion public, maybe, by a simple invitation?

Why can’t we discuss this subject? More than a subject, this palpable reality.



Because they are afraid, they don’t want to melt, they don’t want supervision, they don’t want clarity, what they want is simplicity- simplification and awe, Laura, for the Duschene re-mark, thank you.



And when you recall the head of sociology and human rights insisting on the fact the only human rights are freedom of expression, (denigrating rights as justice, share, redistribution, right to peace and life, right to a living a prospering environment for humans and other species...) while his own department will have to watch the finitude of their specialities without been able to utter a world or if not you loose your seats and chairs, mes petits.



Now, I talk to the interested directly, I came from the very first day, am law-abiding, not a total wreck, maybe.

I was here the first day of the college presentation, in this fantastic lecture room without tables.

It is a bit difficult for the mature student to stay focus in this condition, I work uniquely with my back and for longer that I thought would be, derision.

You talk(ed) a lot about business, ce jour-ci.

Human rights is right your business too, is it?

I calm myself each time hearing the name of business, thinking there is fair trade, t inquiete pas.

Because without human rights, the true ones, the noble, the ones that are to the service of individuals, their protectors-actions and the whole living universe, to the service of and served by any; because without human rights the business baby would be all and crooky.

Crooky, our baby?

I am homo, and when someone say to me that heteros are the ones fit for bringing up children, the answer is that one could retrieved the heirs from the tip of the rubbish or the trip of made famine and thief fifa family where she/he is left- but no, no possible there is health and safety.

I know the state of our toilets, the marble replacing the brand new ones already.

The state of your desk I guess it.





Please go vomit or cry in the nature please, as for primary, zero emission fertilizer, as recycling is still pollution, justement.

Consider the environment.







Ps: a brief on intellectual property i won’ t reclaim any copyrights, or just the one of a occasional multitask in turn secretary, observer, student- an healthy living and healthy working condition – Democracy and HR truly, because like it is always the case for creativity, these are the ideas passed on me by someone I know. Ideas passed on the air of the dramatic scenes that are, by our buildings and hypocrisy, veiled so cosy.







This was a subject on: a democratic, open, accountable, transparent meeting on the why of this scarcity and repression on human rights university, could be, any?



Case study.

































• Darren O'Byrne

I hear that the new residents of the Duchesne building, which used to house Crucible, will be the postgrad/research team from the Business School. Good people, and good offices. May I wish you all the best in those fantastic spaces. I do hope someone acknowledges that CETL capital funding was diverted from a Southlands extension to rescue the rebuilding of the old Mandela bulding to create Duchesne. So the University has benified from the CETL money and should acknowledge this somehow.





May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard working scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies.



as far as i am concerned i am the one that have been censured for having said that no one wanted to admit that human rights were scrapped nationaly and not only locally. also the campaign (pain) could have become tough and long sighting and long enduring. but the “were to have campaigned”camping had rather shushed it, go one praising the mausoleum roehampton. i am so sorry to say that having been censured by the very bureaucracy of human rights, by your students, whose professors have let, without reacting if not relieved, or perhaps amused, of course it is somewhat easy to teach 20 odds without making them understand that it is not because that they enrolled human rights that they are becoming the justs, suddenly, perhaps could they thus learn the only way to change the society as well as one’s one position to destiny, mainly to be fair ad bellum and in belly. When you realize that a bunch of human rights students decide to get rid of many people (first the alternative parties, after the people that don’t speak their way in order to put on their cv that they have run a campaign that they know could not be a runner…) ready to warn the population about what was going on, get rid of these people in order to seem, to appear to be the orchestrator of the stories. That these people claim to fight for philo and arts, and cannot take a little bit of additional data- aside their reordering recorded (laudatory men try on the same petition) commendation and admiration to their potential employers in branding that what might be the worse of anti human rights (them), to advertise for it in doing the opposite. What is an office practicing redundancies of force aiming at pose and expand human rights issues, problematic and along side though their innate antidote? It is why people does not want to hear about human rights any longer, as people does not want to have to pay allegiance and support to an office, a bureau clamming defence of human rights- and the power of the legimity that those are conferring- while being their enemies and by extension enemies of human dignity, raison and liberty.

These “human rights screwers” are the one why people have given up or are against or like it should have been will have to counter.



On the students’ petitions just listing the advertising that roehampton university did a propos the human rights section, lying publicity by the way just parroted by students signing a petition or at least writing it in being the one perfectly knowing that they were “polls hope prey”.

On human rights victims of secular seclusion. Secessionist not between slavery pro or anti, as or there is no rights or the rights to prey on penury.

A waste of time again, I can see from there the big smile of salaries doers.

Ps:

i ll have to thank you sincerely for this, honey. Find your action on action stuff, don't be leave thinking that these guys need much convincing. It is a time war also, they could well be paid to the postponment of deeds and leads.



On the students chasing a political groups wanting to let the population know about human rights endangered. They chase them, the so well mannered and bred student of this so well kept and quiet, on no evening booze, bouse. They chase them out of their still born pretense of campaign that would have drawn them salaries if they have been able to do it for it, fake.

• Hi, boyz,

You were claiming of not wanting to do an aggressive campaign. I hope you were talking about the guys that went and react to the save the human rights issues.

Who were they? Did you quite appreciate the fact that people took time to support these issues?

No, because at the students meeting, what you said is that the management were against your starting a ‘campaign’ (a campaign is a war term, soit dit en passant), that they had destroyed the banners with the security guards...every one was very distraught about that.

And at the meeting with the management – exactly 4 hours later- you suddenly became very assertive about your not wanting these guys come into the story, saying this time that they were the source of violence.

May we know what happens exactly?



I did not know quiet to believe.



Hey, sweet hearts, about campaigning, it is again (no, it is still) a Roehampton speciality.

It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. (meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter.



You said, let’s wait what the ‘the board binning it’ ’s reactions will be.

I agreed with you, i thought that the existence of human rights curriculum- the right word thank you to the person who used it- were somewhat linked with the national decision-making- whence the possibility of waging a campaign and say something like ‘protection, promoting, peace and social stability’ ‘national vocational qualification??’ i don’t know something.



By the way, how much correct and empathising do you desire to remain. We are actually trying to defend their own baby from subjection?



about 6 months ago •LikeUnlike • •SubscribeUnsubscribe



o

o

o

o







Press Shift+Enter to start a new line.





Chris Bond

For a more objective view of today’s protest including the occupation see our very own Nina Power's (Senior Lecturer in Philosophy) article in the Guardian. Whilst violence should not be condoned history shows that when those in power become so arrogant to those they represent then people will rise up and take direct action. On a positive note it was excellent to see tens of thousands of students and staff campaigning together against this heinous attack on our education system. Well done to RU students for turning out in such a large number!!



http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/10/student-protests-conservative-party-hq-occupation



Student protests: we are all in this together
Nina Power
Comment is free
The Guardian

www.guardian.co.uk

Nina Power: The occupation of Conservative party HQ is about so much more than fees. At last the country is beginning to fight back



might i remind you when this compain ended?

more or less when you started firing people over your cv buildings.

from the start.



I ll remind you a old adage, certainly much more than our grannies’.

Don’t ever confound virginity and profundity, sacrosanctity, scarcity and purity.

Because the campaign you would be one of those, you the one that erected themselves bright enough for not answering critics to your campaign, not the roehampton one like it was claimed to be, not the let’s save human rights but your pridity, your campain that were doing nothing, that clause in insulting people that were asking and asking you again, but what shall we do? This way cannot be winning? What did you do apart of not answering no one concern and fire the person that start commenting on what you were doing? Because you know I just wanted a little bit of a play when after 10 essays I realize that not even a words would be address on your fabrication: the still born.

I knew the campaign was to be a failure, you don’t fight injustice with flowers to who will pay.





Don’t ever confound virginity and profundity, sacrosanctity, scarcity and purity.

Because the campaign you would be one of those you would still be campaigning darling.



On the student firing as they were feinging not encompassing the danger of executing a rarity.

No student of human rights is what I try to awake in them.

Well ieasy, without even been notified, I could not enter the group setting up by them, but deemed to represent the effort of human right fighting for human rights banned by the university.

Oh I would like to thank everybody to have been concern by the bend that the lexicon was taking. Making comments on how people might express themselves, being shocked that someone wanted to talk more – to use the way words were put to do one thing complaining about participation, any how no one wanted to organize but censor. You voice one concern stuff that you did not want to read, but to be expelling, judge the matter. You know I am older than you and you know what guys you offered to yourself since you manage to do nothing for this campaing, you only act was to expel the one that at the end just was amusing the rest in revealing that no one was at ti. We could have done something in laughing a little bit. But you had made one action there, was to reassemble, do a can-do gangaroo court and give you the self satisfaction of banning someone of internet grouping using one of the most saddening internet opportunities- dead accountability. You are anti human rights, you are anti democracy.

And for the desert, no one talked to me whereas we are in the same building.

Go on writing, if I had a wish is for the ones that did not perceived it to be a grand comedy because of being unexperienced, and for those who pretend I ll tell you like in the 50’s. Shame, with one comment on it. Shame do kill… if not used to refrain liar, manipulator and greedy.



Ps: a lot of messages, as a fast typist I always slipped on entry, attacking a new message instead of continuing the liturgy.

Accused of profanity, as I was invoking pets’ name when it was too adamant that they would hear for the campaing against, solely the voice master, the dam same dame that promised us to be assassinate but deigning dinned if one would sign for her on lit = bad bed.

As for profanity, I hope you will be crying on this work on day.

We should have unit, your site has been a model of disorganization.

Read and read, people were reading reading, what had been done. Nothing, not a single action. We will, we will, we will, not a single report, conclusion, warning, resume, nothing.

But it makes sense though human rights is being scrapped that means that jobs related too. It is a coup that you were enacting. We take the subject we pass for a work group, with little titles and so and son.

We do make believe that the subjects is fought for, etc, while we are condemning after ignoring any kind of effort. Hacking, jelly mandering, obscurantism, cheap insolence = to say oneself the boss and darwf any way people want to participate in by doing nothing while monopolizing the reins, ok…

It is a bit amazing to note how many skills might have a student, when they are but those. And it is not like I would not know how it happens, ti is not something you are unaware of, it is something you plan to do, reproducing the we won’t name philosophy and practicing. You are just whores. Talking about the bureau who did not make it talking about the one who did nothing talking about the ones who were complaining talking about me, k-rein and the ones Inner, the ones that would be under your chains, others, thinkers, human, that love. H.r.

Human rights by you is already taken by not business but crooks that hopeful won’t go indefinitely go hand in hand.

But finally that was nothing more than nothing, the campaign is dead like it deserved to be. Sharks playing offensed and cry baby.

So you, know when you understand that they are the same one playing boss in a whilst, bullying your mum and the sort, you start using bad words.

Great sensiblery of yours, while the last specialists class of the uk was scrapped before your not your eyes, but your used using yes.



It istyou say you can try till you are blue in the last noteface, but my friend have you tried of this campaign the great guyones you are so intimately linking with, what do you imply that think he will represent them all. After that adn woo washing twothey half have tried really? too nice of you this patently.



Response to the only person after dozens of messages later, the campain went stand still. If Ifro nothing proposing the team to unit and gather infromation about what have been tried to be done, and also to start a campaign of information at least thinkwithin our uni.

I would have like to think that they were just like me a banded imbecile, but not they were warned and no one can deny their reading and writing showing...also...





Hi Lindsey, i d like you to know that if i had not been banned from the site (sit et) for having insisted that it, eat, their only deed, the petition was a forgery persuasion of praise to the university that had been sold to the enemy, future human rights breaching industrially, instead of asking for good governance of democracy. I would have helped you straight away i am sorry for not having been able to read you before. i also think that your proposal of at last stop monopolizing and hostageing the group supposed to lead something against or info to vex, of info to test, of info to bless, to make the issue know of at least other roehampton students and listing what had been done already of not an issue, but of our issues, of these minimum of 50 human rights students and their tutors modes, of fashion and models: namely nothing, was the sole but great and appropriate idea of that has been, and still is as a remain of h.r dead, a waste of the time on student whinery and profs disability.





I could not resit, resist this is the last message of the campain. (came pain)

Sam

Hi everyone, good to see that the spamming problems and other problems experienced on monday have been resolved, this is looking like a proper campaign now :) I Just thought i'd let you know that i'm your social sciences representative for the Student Senate (meeting with all the important people of the uni :P inc our vc). I think what your doing is excellent, and would like to get involved in any way I can. If you want to talk to me you can pm me....or email or



Vc= the guy that raise his sluraly as well as slavery. Salary and fees of the next to go bled. May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard wor-king scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies. Im sure many of them could teach business, if given the chance to do so once made redudant - AFTER THE CONSULTATION PROCESS!

C: and what if civil society is the way new age to reduce us to private gangs-e?

And the human rights only a misnomer? Name.







• John Sykes

"Professor Paul O'Prey, vice-chancellor at Roehampton University, had a 21 per cent pay rise to £218,000, (now on £246,000) as well the 'tax-free benefit' of a home." (Daily Mail)



However it is not because of being a sulbaterne of the board that the money more will be sudden loose use to your protection, belle?







from a university staff I think.

Where's your commitment to access for the working classes to education now O'Prey. You spout about your “working class roots” at every opportunity - clearly you can be brought off too!!! £££££ Perhaps you should take a lesson from the honorable, ethical and committed first VC of RU Sister Dr Bernadette Porter who drew a salary of £103,000 and gave £100,000 of this to the Sacred Heart Order that she lived in, and lived on £3,000 a year. Why are you paid more than the VC of Kingston, Oxford Brookes and Leeds Met when they are triple the size of RU!!!! Why has RU just had to spend £2,000,000 on buying you a house to live in rent free in Putney!!! (Perhaps so you and Nick Clegg can share a Sherry at night - shame on both of you for turning blue!!!). We know about your spies reading this - Hi Christine and Michael!!! - Start being embarrassed when the requests for freedom of information about yours and the fat cats you've employed salaries and perks come in - oh and the fact the Director of Finance partner drafted the finance regs. Your corrupt regime won't survive - no wonder Vince Cable doesn't take you seriously when you screw more out of honest taxpayers than the PM!!!

The University should sell your “grace and favour” house that would mean we don’t need to close a course that is excellent and that you talk about non-stop when it suits you.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1259682/University-heads-given-pay-rises-28-cent.htm



University heads given pay rises of up to 28 per cent

www.dailymail.co.uk

Professors including Malcolm Grant of UCL had their salaries increased at the peak of the recession, and there have been further increases this year.





youruniversitythankyouverymuch



on the impossibility to know about the exact functioning of the funding. But still we ve got a vague hint of dismal dismissal autocracy administrative.



hi , look i don' t know quite to whom i shall adress for this question, since you are the “on the ground” one...

i was wondering by what kind of system of funds the duschne building has been erected and sanctified a human rights building? by state funds? human rights allocation?





i am doing research about the funding of a building of human rights standing at roehampton university.

could you help me with these?

england helpline@equalityhumanrights.com



i contact the Higher Education Funding Council they told me it has probably been funded by more than a source. i contact the equality branch responsible for human rights funds they did not answer me yet.

i think i ll try to ask directly at roehampton office.





















Historical materialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or — this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms — with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development, of the productive forces, these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead, sooner or later, to the transformation of the whole, immense, superstructure.

In studying such transformations, it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic, or philosophic — in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out.

















In this section

• News Home

• News Archive

• Events



SearchSearch:

News and events

Breadcrumbs

• Home »

• News

Cherie Booth QC opens the Duchesne Building

Story Posted: 23 November 2006

New state-of-the-art teaching facility

Cherie Booth QC opens the Duchesne Building and launches national Human Rights Centre at Roehampton University

Leading human rights lawyer Cherie Booth QC opened the Duchesne Building yesterday, a new state-of-the-art teaching facility that will house Crucible, the national centre of excellence for human rights education.

Addressing staff, students and friends of the University, Ms Booth said she was delighted to be part of such a significant step for human rights education.

Ms Booth spoke of the importance of human rights in society, drawing on headlines ripped from today’s news, such as the issues of childhood bullying and how early the notion of human rights should be introduced to children in a context they will understand.

Chancellor John Simpson echoed Ms Booth’s sentiments, recalling his own experience: “When I started out as a journalist, human rights was a code word we used for how the Soviet treated its people, and thought we were perfect. Things have changed.”

Mr Simpson said the Crucible project was a reflection of Roehampton University’s ability and passion for tackling complex, global issues.

Vice Chancellor Professor Paul O’Prey said the building was an integral element of Roehampton University’s new strategy for campus development.

“The Duchesne building is a wonderful environment for teaching, with the latest state of the art facilities. The quality of the student experience is at the top of our agenda and we are determined to give them the best possible environment in which to learn.”

The innovative space boasts a 150-seat lecture theatre, exhibition and reception space and 13 teaching rooms, with adaptable features and internet connectivity to accommodate a variety of cutting-edge teaching activities and methods.

Crucible is funded by a £4.5m grant from the government’s Higher Education Funding Council for England. The Centre works with a range of partners, including other universities, non-government organisations (NGOs), businesses and community groups.

Its innovative new courses include leading a European Masters degree in Human Rights Practice, funded by the European Commission under its prestigious Erasmus Mundus programme and delivered in collaboration with universities in Norway and Sweden.

The new building is named in honour of Rose-Phillipine Duchesne, educational pioneer and early founder of the Society of the Sacred Heart, which founded Roehampton University’s Digby Stuart College in 1874. Philippine Duchesne pioneered free education for Native Americans in the Mid-West in the early nineteenth century, teaching Potawatomi girls in a log cabin, in the most basic of conditions, at Sugar Creek, Kansas.

“With her spirit of adventure, her commitment to bringing education as a human right to all peoples of the world, no matter what their social or economic standing, Philippine would have been both amazed and delighted at what we are celebrating today,” said Professor O’Prey.

(The same guy that announces fees for lust higher education and human rights scrapping 5 years after while the guys saying we don’t have much is are raising its their own salaries.)



Firstly edited a letter to the head of SS social sickhences. Sciences. As our own chief of department judged h.r a minor affairs.

It has to be done as that academic as the head of the human rights department (and prof of democracy) and as the department was under ablation took the stance of saying that Human Rights (h.r) was a subsubject to sociology; whereas H.R is even not only a social sicence, silenced, but is a field that is as independent as it ought to be in interdependence with every other matters concerning humans, humanity and their consequential doings and activities.

He also said that humans rights surviving arts was only to be found in the first generation of rights (namely liberal rights = civil and political rights), also relegating all other rights (one example amongst thousands: the right of a sustainable economy, consumption and production) to non rights.





As a conclusion I d like to give you another idea:



Human rights students mounting a project that would have been thought as an expensive one, extensive one, to protect?? The ensured “”the right to euthanasia””.

With as a buttress to say that it was nice to abridge people distress.

I ll leave it to you, I wish I was the traitress.

But I, you ve, got the right to be euthanasiaed.

On overpopulation, on the old (that are not to be seen in the streets already as they are pushed away exactly like the bikes by the cars that no one came with the idea to fine when they almost twice a day almost run over one guy) and differently able stigma (who are left without job but with the certain future of being scrapped from the genetic tank of the new engeneering that form themselves thinking that mercy killing is the management of their positions and situations’ great idea). Of the diseases in this spiritual world knowing but throuwing out, of the illness that will widespread as much as exterminated wildness has been.